Which company cloned the ibm bios

Franklin released this clone of the Apple II in , almost five years after the original. Apple won a copyright lawsuit against Franklin, which eventually switched to making handheld computers instead. In , Franklin unabashedly copied the Apple II design. Apple sued. At that time there was not even a founding father Compaq Compaq The computer that " Compaq Portable "Is a machine that is fully compatible with the world's first IBM PC, a start-up Compaq is a historical computer that has made a start to the mainstream of the computer industry.

Furthermore, it is a computer that sometimes is said to be "portable in the Compaq Portable", in a portable form as its name suggests. As a co-founder, he served as CEO of Compaq for a long time about the situation at that time when such Compaq Portable was made by reverse engineering without infringing the intellectual property rights of the giant IBM Rod Canyon He is speaking. Canyon, who later decided to establish Compaq, served as an intermediate manager of Texas Instruments.

Canyon was planning to make portable portable computers that could be carried independently, but he said that the investment was refused by Mr. Ben Rosen, venture capitalist. At that time, Mr. Canyon and his colleagues Jim Harris and Bill Mart talked at the restaurant, it seems that an important idea that triggered the birth of Compaq was born.

In response to Mr. Those specifications were handed to the legal team. The legal team handed them to a team of engineers. The engineers implemented them. So she's a compound of a team, and I think the strange subplot about the friendly OS is completely fictitious; probably groundwork for Joe's discovery of the Apple Macintosh i. The people usually lauded from Compaq are the management, for successful execution of the machine; not any star engineer. But that sounds like boring television.

One group at Phoenix examined the BIOS software documented in IBM's Technical Reference Manual , and wrote a set of specifications that described how the program functioned without including any examples of actual code. This description was passed on to a single programmer who tried to write code that fulfilled its specifications. Source: PC Mag, Jul 10, , p. It was a big gamble. Maybe the producers can be given some leeway because the "Compaq story" was also distorted in computer press and the internet, of course as being the "first PC clone".

Also like Cardiff, Corona Data Systems in sold a majority share to a conglomerate, Daewoo Group of Korea, who later deliberately bankrupted them, using them a corporate tax shelter. Not Compaq's. Many internet sites think that adding the term "legal" make the Portable's claim as "first", legit. It doesn't. Nor does "portable". IBM never came near Compaq with a legal team, as they did in the series with Cardiff. IBM's lawyers accepted from the beginning, that the "cleanroom" technique immunized companies from their copyright claims.

The others had many more incompatibilities than Compaq's Portable. But the first one had been Tandy. They were the leader for a while before IBM came along. And then, Compaq came along. I have not looked at the whole episode. I am gonna watch it. It looks pretty exciting. It may actually be as exciting as the real thing. Note: Since some have asked, just wanted to make it clear that I have not been paid or given consideration or in any way encouraged by AMC, Rod Canion or anyone else to do this episode and post.

Just found it interesting and timely. This is all very well and clever, but misinformed, due to its US-centricness. Olivetti beat Compaq to the punch and did a rather better job of it. Compaq beat Olivetti to market by nearly a year and had the design completed by November of , releasing in March of Thanks Nicole! I knew nothing about Olivetti. Happy to get corrections with new info new to me, of course.

The M24 did have a better spec and features and lower price than IBM. The TI was thus based upon a set of software that it could never own. He could not understand the potential of the spreadsheet. He could have won for TI, and yet he and Stav Prodomo rejected it and convinced the new overall Division manager Rex Naden , to shuck the concept. In February, a Harvard Business 2nd year came to interview for a job. As I had attended there the prior year, he was assigned to me for the process.

He fell in love with it, and wanted to start at TI. He became disgruntled when TI decided against it, and recruited me into his venture Personal Software. Visicalc was the result, and the rest is history. Sadly, he Dan Fylstra was not as honest as I had hoped, and essentially stole the entire business plan after TI released it to me.

There is more that was not put online if you are interested. Interestingly, we did indeed have a very smart woman Susan who the actress the wife closely models.

She was a programmer who was never trusted or fully utilized.